header-logo header-logo

18 July 2025
Issue: 8125 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 18 July 2025

Arbitration

The Republic of India v CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd (in administration) and other companies [2025] EWHC 1738 (Comm)

The King’s Bench Division heard an application regarding the joinder of parties to an arbitration claim and whether preliminary issues should be addressed before a substantive question of law under s 45 of the Arbitration Act 1996. The central point was whether the arbitral tribunal, seated in England, must exclusively apply Mauritian law to determine representation of the Mauritian companies involved. The tribunal had previously ruled that Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP could act on behalf of the Mauritian companies in arbitration despite contrary claims by an administrator appointed under Mauritian insolvency law. The court directed the determination of proposed preliminary issues as a case management measure. Further it was appropriate to add the Mauritian Companies ‘represented by Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP on the instructions of the directors and shareholders of the said companies’ as interveners.


Building safety

Triathlon Homes LLP v Stratford Village Development Partnership and other companies [2025]

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll