header-logo header-logo

17 October 2025
Issue: 8135 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 17 October 2025

Costs

R (Bates) v Highbury Corner Magistrates’ Court [2025] EWHC 2532 (Admin)

The Divisional Court ruled on the claimant’s applications for the costs incurred in bringing the judicial review proceedings and for ‘costs thrown away’ in the criminal proceedings in the magistrates’ court. The court determined that the decision in Murphy v Media Protection Services, which established an exceptionality requirement for awarding inter partes costs under s 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 (SCA 1981) in criminal judicial review, was wrongly decided and should not be followed. The court held that s 51, SCA 1981 preserved the High Court’s discretion to award costs in judicial review proceedings involving criminal causes or matters without requiring exceptional circumstances. The court found that the interested party had acted improperly and vexatiously in initiating a private prosecution, which justified awarding costs against him in favour of the claimant. It was concluded that the costs of the judicial review should be assessed on a standard basis and the application regarding costs of the magistrates’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll