header-logo header-logo

Law digest: Legal profession

15 January 2009
Issue: 7352 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

C v W [2008] EWCA Civ 1459, [2008] All ER (D) 239 (Dec)

Where a conditional fee agreement includes a term to the effect that: “If we advise you to reject an off er of settlement or payment into court and the case goes ahead to trial where you are awarded damages which are equal to or less than the offer or payment in, you do not have to pay any of our basic costs or percentage increase for the work done after we receive notice of the off er or payment in”, it is worth considering the inclusion of a variant of the two-stage success fee discussed in Callery v Gray [2001] EWCA Civ 1117, [2001] 3 All ER 833, in the form of a clause giving them the right to review the success fee once an offer to which the clause applies has been made (See Law reports p 73–74).
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll