header-logo header-logo

Employment

14 January 2010
Issue: 7400 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd [2009] All ER (D) 233 (Dec)

In considering a complaint of discrimination on the ground of religious belief, contrary to the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003, SI 2003/1660, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that persons with a religious belief were likely to manifest that belief in their conduct. 

In some cases where an employer objected to such a manifestation it might be impossible to see any basis for the objection other than an objection to the belief which it manifested; and in such a case a claim by the employer to be acting on the grounds of the former but not the latter might have been regarded as a distinction without a difference. 

But in other cases there would be a clear and evidently genuine basis for differentiation between the two, and in such a case the fact that the employee’s motivation for the conduct in question might be found in his wish to manifest his religious belief did not mean that that belief was the ground of the employer’s action.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll