header-logo header-logo

Criminal Litigation

17 May 2007
Issue: 7273 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R v M (No 2) [2007] EWCA Crim 970, [2007] All ER (D) 258 (Apr)

Although rulings made in the course of preparatory hearings should normally continue throughout the trial, they are not immutable. If the interests of justice as a whole so require, a ruling at a preparatory hearing might be changed.

Although a Crown Court judge cannot vary or reverse any ruling consequent on the decision of the Court of Appeal merely because he disagrees or believes it to be wrong, the jurisdiction under s 31(11) of the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 does not expire just because the ruling in question was made by the Court of Appeal.

If a ruling made at a preparatory hearing is overturned on appeal but the Court of Appeal differently constituted in a subsequent case holds that the earlier case was decided per incuriam, the judge is bound to follow the later decision, since any rulings of law made at preparatory hearings must correctly reflect the law which will govern the trial.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll