header-logo header-logo

Sentencing

28 June 2007
Issue: 7279 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R v Harries [2007] All ER (D) 48 (Jun)

Neither s 234 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (CJA 2003) nor the provisions of the CJA 2003  (Commencement No 8 and Transitional and Saving Provisions) Order 2005 (SI 2005/950) empower a court to impose a sentence on an individual as though the offence had been committed after 5 April 2005 (the commencement date of the dangerousness provisions of CJA 2003), merely because the dates on the relevant count straddle that date.

In a case where a count on an indictment spans the commencement date, the court should not impose any penalty under ss 224 to 229 unless it is satisfied that at least one relevant offence was committed after the  commencement date. Once it is so satisfied, the mere fact that the count on the indictment has been framed in such a way to straddle the commencement date would not prevent the court applying, if appropriate, the dangerousness provisions for that offence.

Even if it is not open to the court to invoke the dangerousness provisions in respect of offences committed before the commencement date, if there are qualifying offences committed after it, those committed before might have some bearing on the issue of dangerousness or the determination of the minimum term.

Issue: 7279 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Chronic delays, duplication of work, cancelled hearings and inefficiencies in the family law courts are letting children and victims of domestic abuse down, a Public Accounts Committee (PAC) inquiry has found
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
back-to-top-scroll