header-logo header-logo

06 September 2007
Issue: 7287 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

EMPLOYMENT LAW

Blundell v Governing Body of St Andrew’s Catholic Primary School [2007] IRLR 652, [2007] All ER (D) 159 (May)

EMPLOYMENT LAW

The employee was a schoolteacher. She brought a sex discrimination claim when, following her return from maternity leave, she was allocated a different class to teach from the one she had taught before taking leave.

Held Construing reg 18 of the Maternity and Parental Leave Regulations 1999: the tribunal should have in mind both

(i) the purposes of the legislation, and (

(ii) the fact that the regulations themselves provide for exceptional cases—namely that where it is not reasonably practicable for the employer to permit her to return to her previous job, he may provide for her return to another job which is both suitable for her and appropriate for her to do in the circumstances.

As to

(i), the legislation seeks to ensure  that there is as little dislocation as reasonably possible in her working life, so as to avoid adding to the burdens which will  inevitably exist in her family or private life simply because she has a very young infant making new demands upon her. As to

(ii), even given that the purpose of the legislation is to protect the employee, there is no need to construe “same job” as covering a broad spectrum of work to ensure an  appropriate balance between employer and employee. “Job” can be quite specifically defined. Latitude is provided by an employer being able to provide a job which is not the same job, but is nonetheless suitable (per Langstaff J at para 56).

Issue: 7287 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll