header-logo header-logo

CRIMINAL LITIGATION

04 October 2007
Issue: 7291 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R v Cordingley [2007] All ER (D) 131 (Sep)

There were heated exchanges between the judge and defence counsel, as the judge was highly critical of the time estimate for the trial; the defendant—whose bail was revoked—did not receive clean clothes until the afternoon of the third day of the trial.

It was held that the safety of a conviction does not depend merely on the strength of the evidence that has been heard, but also on the observance of due process. Every defendant is entitled to be treated fairly, courteously, and with due regard to the presumption of innocence.

In this case there had been a failure of due process on account of the judge’s conduct.

Issue: 7291 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll