header-logo header-logo

CRIMINAL LITIGATION

04 October 2007
Issue: 7291 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R v Cordingley [2007] All ER (D) 131 (Sep)

There were heated exchanges between the judge and defence counsel, as the judge was highly critical of the time estimate for the trial; the defendant—whose bail was revoked—did not receive clean clothes until the afternoon of the third day of the trial.

It was held that the safety of a conviction does not depend merely on the strength of the evidence that has been heard, but also on the observance of due process. Every defendant is entitled to be treated fairly, courteously, and with due regard to the presumption of innocence.

In this case there had been a failure of due process on account of the judge’s conduct.

Issue: 7291 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll