header-logo header-logo

CRIMINAL LITIGATION

04 October 2007
Issue: 7291 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of A) v South Yorkshire Police [2007] EWHC 1261 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 233 (Jul)

A number of juveniles sought to challenge the decision to charge them rather than give a final warning under the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, s 65. They argued that the decision contravened the relevant Home Office Circular (14/2006).

It was held that the court should not intervene unless it is clearly established that the decision to prosecute the defendants came about as a result of a departure from the statutory guidance and there is no rational explanation for that departure; even then, any intervention by the court would be discretionary.

The ultimate question for decision is whether or not the decision to prosecute is sustainable.

Issue: 7291 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll