header-logo header-logo

LIMITATION

08 February 2007
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

McCoubrey v Ministry of Defence [2007] EWCA Civ 17, [2007] All ER (D) 185 (Jan)

The question of whether an injury is significant within s 14(1)(a) of the Limitation Act 1980, as expanded in s 14(2), must be decided by reference to the seriousness of the injury, and not by reference to its effect or perceived effect on the claimant’s private life or career.

Section 14(2) requires consideration of whether the claimants ought reasonably to have appreciated that their injuries were serious. The effect of the injury on the claimant’s private life or career prospects does not impinge on the issue of whether the injury itself was sufficiently serious.

Issue: 7259 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Rachael Chapman

Muckle LLP—Rachael Chapman

Sports, education and charities practice welcomes senior associate

Ellisons—Carla Jones

Ellisons—Carla Jones

Partner and head of commercial litigation joins in Chelmsford

Freeths—Louise Mahon

Freeths—Louise Mahon

Firm strengthens Glasgow corporate practice with partner hire

NEWS
One in five in-house lawyers suffer ‘high’ or ‘severe’ work-related stress, according to a report by global legal body, the Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC)
The Legal Ombudsman’s (LeO’s) plea for a budget increase has been rejected by the Law Society and accepted only ‘with reluctance’ by conveyancers
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
back-to-top-scroll