header-logo header-logo

Trademarks

25 January 2007
Issue: 7257 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Special Effects Ltd v L’Oreal SA [2007] EWCA Civ 1, [2007] All ER (D) 29 (Jan)

Decisions made in proceedings in the Trade Mark Registry against one party do not give rise to issue estoppel in subsequent legal proceedings in the High Court since the decisions of the registry are not final against the party who lost in those proceedings.

Therefore, it is not an abuse of process for the party who loses in the registry to raise similar issues in subsequent High Court proceedings between the same parties.

Issue: 7257 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll