header-logo header-logo

Family law

06 August 2009
Issue: 7381 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Re A (children) (care proceedings: threshold criteria) [2009] EWCA Civ 853, [2009] All ER (D) 354 (Jul)

The threshold of “significant harm”, in the context of making of care orders pursuant to s 31 of the Children Act 1989, was not comparatively low. In a case where there was a likelihood of a child suffering harm it was necessary to establish that there was a real possibility that he would suffer significant harm.

While having to show no more than a real possibility of harm made the threshold a low one, it still had to be a real possibility of significant harm. The harm had to be significant whether dealing with harm which had been suffered, or when dealing only with the likelihood of it being suffered. Therefore, the word “significant” had to be given its proper meaning in the scheme of the Act.

Issue: 7381 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll