header-logo header-logo

Family law

12 March 2009
Issue: 7360 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

T (a child) (care order) [2009] EWCA Civ 121, [2009] All ER (D) 47 (Mar)

The making of a care order even though children remained living at home might be justified where the local authority needs the power not only to remove the children instantly but also to plan for their long-term placement outside the family without any prior judicial sanction, or where it is necessary for the local authority to share parental responsibility with the parents.

It would be wrong to impose an order simply to encourage a local authority to perform its statutory duty towards children in need. Moreover, cogent and strong reasons are required to force upon a local authority a more draconian order than that for which it has asked.

Issue: 7360 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll