header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 26 June 2020

23 June 2020
Issue: 7892 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Child

A local authority v M and others [2020] EWFC 43, [2020] All ER (D) 82 (Jun)

The father’s application to adjourn a part-heard final hearing, concerning the welfare of his child, was dismissed. The Family Court noted that the relevant principles and guidance applicable to determining the question of whether to hold a remote or hybrid hearing or to adjourn to await a fully face to face hearing had, necessarily, evolved as the understanding of the nature, extent and likely future impact of the COVID-19 pandemic had evolved. The court held that it was clear from the signposts set out in ‘The Family Court and Covid-19: The Road Ahead’ that adjourning cases indefinitely or for a period of many months would not be a viable option and that adjourning a case to await a fully face to face hearing was unlikely to be a proper course where an effective and fair remote or hybrid hearing could be held with steps taken to maximise the fairness of that remote or hybrid process. Accordingly,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll