header-logo header-logo

Costs

19 March 2009
Issue: 7361 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Costs
printer mail-detail

Tradition (UK) Ltd v Ahmed [2009] All ER (D) 55 (Mar)

In considering the appropriate approach to take in respect of an application for costs against a professional person, there are clear parallels between the jurisdiction that has been exercised in cases involving insolvency practitioners and the jurisdiction to make wasted costs orders that the court exercises in relation to legal professionals.

The court has jurisdiction to make a wasted costs order only where the improper, unreasonable or negligent conduct complained of has caused a waste of costs, and only to the extent of such wasted costs. Demonstration of a causal link is essential.

Issue: 7361 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll