header-logo header-logo

Law digest: 4 September 2008

04 September 2008
Issue: 7335 / Categories: Case law , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment

Claridge v Daler Rowney [2008] IRLR 672

For the purposes of constructive dismissal, it is necessary that the conduct complained of must be calculated to destroy or seriously damage the employment relationship. The employee must be entitled to say: “You have behaved so badly that I should not be expected to have to stay in your employment”. The employee will not be able to satisfy that test unless the behaviour is outside the band of reasonable responses.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll