header-logo header-logo

CRIMINAL LAW

29 May 2008
Issue: 7323 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R v Bassett [2008] Court of Appeal, 14 May

 

For an offence of voyeurism to be committed under s 67 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, there has to be a private act which involved parts of the body for which people would normally expect privacy, as defined by s 68(1).

 

Casual observation by other changing room users does not amount to the offence of voyeurism, even if those observing gain sexual gratification from what they see. Whether the person observed had a reasonable expectation of privacy is one for the jury in each case, and in many cases the question will be related to the nature of the observing rather than the purpose.

 

Issue: 7323 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll