header-logo header-logo

19 June 2008
Issue: 7326 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Law Commission to review pre-nups

Legal news

The enforceability of pre- and post-nuptial agreements between spouses and civil partners is to be examined by the Law Commission in a new review.

Marital property agreements are not currently enforceable in the UK if spouses divorce or a civil partnership is dissolved, although a court may consider them in determining what ancillary relief is appropriate.

A Law Commission spokesperson says there is a view that the fact that pre-nuptial agreements are not currently binding may deter some from marrying or entering into civil partnerships.

Resolution wants pre-marital agreements made binding unless upholding an agreement would cause significant injustice.

A spokesperson says: “Pre-marital agreements are not currently enforceable. They are sometimes upheld by the courts but the law falls short of providing the level of certainty that couples want when they make an agreement.”

Resolution concedes that there is a risk of satellite litigation flowing to define “significant injustice”, but concludes that this is “a small price to pay for the certainty of pre-marital agreements”.

The Commission’s review will be begin next year with a draft Bill expected in 2012. In the meantime, says Charles Russell partner, Sarah Higgins, pre-nuptial agreements will continue to be dealt with by the courts.

“This means that there will still be uncertainty when advising clients on marital breakdown and the potential for expensive litigation,” she says.

Issue: 7326 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll