header-logo header-logo

29 October 2009 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7391 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

The Law in 101 words

Snippets from The Reduced Law Dictionary by Roderick Ramage

Chance it

If you wish to give a trusted client good advice without upsetting your PI insurer or compliance officer, you must explain that, in the Mikado, the Lord High Executioner, Ko Ko, worried about the amount of public money he could spend on the festivities in connection with his approaching marriage. He consulted Poo Bah, the Lord High Everything Else, who, as private secretary advised him not to stint himself, while as chancellor of the exchequer he was bound to see that due economy is observed; but as solicitor, he, as you dare not do, had no hesitation in saying: “Chance it.”

Deposits and s 49(2)

The Law of Property Act 1925 s 49(2) provides that deposits paid by buyers on property contracts may be returned in exceptional circumstances. Midill (97PL) Ltd v Park Lane Estates [2001] shows that we are still learning how that provision works. According to this case, it is not there to rescue buyers whose contracts have turned sour. They must take the risk of market changes and, if they fail to complete, they forfeit their deposits and pay damages for any loss on the sale of the property. Section 49(2) is likely to help buyers only in cases on unconscionable conduct by the seller.

First names

The senior partner in my old firm was Mr to all the staff. Even junior partners were nervous at the transition to first names. This was when the universal use of first names had become trendy but was not yet de rigueur.
I asked trainees to use my first name on being admitted to the roll. One newly qualified solicitor, a tall willowy girl, persisted in mistering me at a meeting with a client, so afterwards I reminded her to call me by my first name. In rely she dropped a deep curtsey saying: “And you may call me Miss Wilkes.”

Law and plumbing

Resignation and righteousness are the twin emotions of plumbers and judges, who share the sadistic pleasure with which they survey the wreckage. Both meet their respective clientele when the latter are, in the case of plumbers literally and in that of judges metaphorically, ankle deep in water. Where the former asks “Oh dear, who installed this? Had a stetson and spurs did he?”, the latter animadverts on the infelicities of parliamentary drafting, the incompetence of contract negotiators, the folly or malice of litigants, the inability of lawyer to see the point and the other worldliness of academic commentaries. (per Sedley LJ)

No visible means of subsistence

Do not forget to take cash or a credit card with you. You may be liable to a fine not exceeding level 1 on the standard scale, if found wandering abroad and lodging in any barn or outhouse, or in any deserted or unoccupied building, or in the open air, or under a tent, or in any cart or waggon, without any visible means of subsistence, not giving a good account of yourself and having failed to apply for or refused accommodation at a reasonably accessible place of shelter: Vagrancy Act 1824 s 4, Vagrancy Act 1835 and Criminal Justice Act 2003.

Over promotion and stress at work

Ms Dickins had been promoted above her ability. Her job involved preparing management and regulatory accounts and quarterly audits, which was at the limit of her abilities; and the promised support and training were not forthcoming. From March 2002 she told the management that she was at the end of her tether, asked for leave and for a less stressful job but later that year suffered a breakdown and left work before help was given. Her psychiatric illness was reasonably foreseeable as she had mentioned her problems frequently, and O2 had negligently failed to address them: Dickins v O2 [2008], CA.

Registered excise dealers and shippers

“Our business has been severely hit by the outbreak of foot and mouth disease which resulted in many of our shows being cancelled. We have been asked to provide champagne for a function being held tomorrow.” Thus, in a letter dated 9 May 2001, Mr Samuelson, of The Fine Champagne Company Limited, applied for a postponement of the hearing on 10 May to hear his appeal against a civil penalty of £250 for the late delivery of a REDS return. He lost. Even a sole trader who spends much time travelling abroad must organise his business to meet his statutory obligations.

Roderick Ramage is a solicitor in private practice at www.law-office.co.uk

Issue: 7391 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll