header-logo header-logo

18 October 2022
Issue: 7999 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Landmark COVID-19 business interruption case

Bakery chain Greggs, the Slug & Lettuce and other household name businesses have won their multi-million COVID-19 business interruption insurance claims at the High Court.

Mr Justice Butcher held substantially in favour of Stonegate, Greggs and Various Eateries in three complex judgments, Stonegate Pub & Ors v Amlin Corporate, Liberty Mutual & Ors [2022] EWHC 2549 (Comm).

Stonegate, which owns 760 pubs and eateries, argued it was entitled to an indemnity in respect of three perils (disease, enforced closure, and prevention of access), that it suffered business interruption losses attributable to multiple triggers and that there was a £15m limit for each single business interruption loss (SBIL).

The insurers accepted they had liability for business interruption loss but had contended it was all attributable to ‘a single occurrence’, was to be aggregated as an SBIL subject to a £2.5m limit, and that this sum had already been paid out to Stonegate in 2020.

Similarly, insurers Zurich contended there was only one ‘single occurrence’ under Greggs’ policy, limiting the bakery to a £2.5m pay-out only.

Greggs successfully argued the £2.5m limit applied each time the Westminster and devolved governments adopted a major COVID restriction measure. Butcher J held there was a single occurrence at the outset of lockdown in March 2020 followed by separate occurrences in each jurisdiction and on each adjustment.

Butcher J also held that regulations which merely continued existing restrictions or made trivial changes did not trigger an extra £2.5m limit.

Manoj Vaghela, partner at Charles Russell Speechlys, which acted for Greggs, said: ‘This outcome vindicates Greggs commencing proceedings and has wider implications for all businesses that purchased the Resilience Insurance policies.

‘Insurers’ argument that there was only one limit available for Covid business interruption losses has been firmly rejected.’

The case now proceeds to phase 2, where the value of recoverable loss is calculated.

Issue: 7999 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll