header-logo header-logo

Landmark adoption decision

10 December 2019
Issue: 7868 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail
A couple whose wish to adopt was rebuffed because of their Indian heritage have won their discrimination claim

Adopt Berkshire declined to progress Sandeep and Reena Mander’s application on the basis they only had white British pre-school children available, already had a surfeit of white British pre-approved prospective adopters and priority would be given to white couples. The agency suggested they adopt a child from India.

Ruling in Mander & Mander v Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead at Oxford County Court, Judge Melissa Clarke held that the couple were discriminated against on the grounds of race. She awarded them general damages of £29,000 and special damages of £60,000 damages for the cost of adopting overseas. The couple have now adopted a child from the US.

The council said it always put the interests of the child first and would review its policies.

Issue: 7868 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll