header-logo header-logo

26 May 2011
Issue: 7467 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Landlords plastered

Landlords are legally responsible for the upkeep of the plaster of a rental property as well as the walls, the Court of Appeal has ruled.

In Grand v Gill [2011] EWCA Civ 554, a tenant brought a disrepair claim against the landlord, complaining of damp and mould on the walls. However, the landlord disputed liability.

The case centred on whether, in s 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, “the structure” of a residential premises, which the landlord is obliged to repair, included plasterwork.

The court held that plasterwork was included, overturning the case of Irvine v Moran [1991] 1 EGLR 261. This means private and public landlords, including local authorities and housing associations, have a legal duty to maintain the plasterwork of their properties.

John de Waal, of Hardwicke, who acted pro bono for Tanya Grand, the tenant, said: “This decision is very significant for housing lawyers, and affects every assured shorthold tenancy.

“This is a vexed issue for housing lawyers and has been before the courts three or four times. There is a lot of litigation about disrepair, particularly in social housing, and it is quite expensive for landlords. However, this fairly and squarely and on uncompromising terms establishes that the landlord is responsible for plasterwork.”
 

Issue: 7467 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll