header-logo header-logo

Lady Brownlie win brings clarity to overseas accidents cases

Lady Brownlie, whose husband died on a driving tour organised by Four Seasons Hotel Cairo at Nile Plaza, has won her appeal at the Supreme Court, in a decision that has significant implications for English nationals injured or killed while travelling overseas

Lady Brownlie was on holiday in Egypt with her husband, the international lawyer Sir Ian Brownlie QC, when the crash happened. She was seriously injured, while Sir Ian and Sir Ian’s daughter Rebecca, a children’s nurse, both died. Lady Brownlie issued a claim in contract and tort in England.

Terrence Donovan, partner, Kingsley Napley, who acted for Lady Brownlie, said: ‘This judgment will provide welcome clarity for any other English nationals who have the misfortune to be injured or killed in foreign accidents, and who wish to bring their claims in the English Courts.

‘Lady Brownlie, by her courage and determination, has done a great favour to them, and made an important contribution to English travel law.’

The Supreme Court had previously remitted the case to the High Court after finding the company sued was not the operator of the hotel. Lady Brownlie was allowed to substitute the defendant and serve proceedings on them out of the jurisdiction. The defendant appealed on the basis permission should not have been given to serve the proceedings out of the jurisdiction. However, this was dismissed by the Court of Appeal.

The defendant then raised two issues before the Supreme Court. The first was whether the claims in tort satisfied the requirements of the jurisdictional gateway in the Civil Procedure Rules. The second was whether Lady Brownlie needed to provide evidence of Egyptian law to show her claims had a reasonable prospect of success.

Ruling in FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Lady Brownlie [2021] UKSC 45, however, the Supreme Court decided in favour of Lady Brownlie and dismissed the defendant’s appeal by a 4-1 majority. The claim will now return to the High Court.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll