header-logo header-logo

29 September 2021
Issue: 7950 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus , Pro Bono
printer mail-detail

Labour would set pro bono targets

City firms would have to meet a national pro bono target to be eligible for government contracts, under proposals announced by Shadow Justice Secretary David Lammy MP

Speaking at the Labour Party conference in Brighton this week, Lammy said the requirement would be at least 35 hours of pro bono legal services per lawyer per year. A legally binding target of 20 hours per lawyer will be set for in-house legal teams at organisations seeking government contracts.

He would create a state-run national pro bono centre alongside the target to encourage partnership between the public and private sector. The centre would promote awareness, offer practical tools and resources to reduce barriers to participation and connect individuals taking part. The pro bono target can be signed up to by law firms, individual law firm solicitors, barristers and barristers’ chambers.

City firms announced record profits this year, with full equity partners at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Allen & Overy and Clifford Chance taking home £1.91m, £1.9m and £1.85m, respectively.

In April 2013, the government removed legal aid from large areas of civil law, for example, those in need of housing law help were suddenly unable to obtain legal aid help unless they were in imminent risk of homelessness.

Lammy said: ‘City Law firms are making billions in profit, while low-paid workers see their tax bill rise and wages fall.

‘This party recognises the importance of the private sector doing their bit in partnership with the public sector.’

Lammy also called for a ‘turning point’ in tackling violence against women, following several recent high-profile murders of women out walking. He reaffirmed Labour’s current commitment to fast-track rape and sexual assault cases, increased minimum sentences for rapists, the creation of a new offence of street harassment, ensuring victims of domestic abuse get legal aid and making misogyny a hate crime.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said pro bono plays an important role in access to justice but should never be a substitute for legal aid―lawyers currently provide an estimated £7m worth of pro bono advice per year, while legal aid delivers about £1.7bn worth.

 

Issue: 7950 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus , Pro Bono
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll