header-logo header-logo

15 March 2017
Issue: 7738 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Kirsty Gomersal—DAC Beachcroft

kirsty_gomersal

Firm appoints new partner to its national safety health & environment team

DAC Beachcroft LLP has appointed Kirsty Gomersal as a partner in its market-leading national safety, health & environment (SHE) team.

Kirsty, who joins from Clyde & Co, specialises in all aspects of regulatory compliance, particularly complex environmental and health and safety defence work.

An expert in environmental law, she regularly advises on appeals against Environment Agency Notices, waste, pollution and permitting issues. In addition, she is experienced in drafting enforcement undertakings and advising on ancillary matters such as restraint and proceeds of crime.

Also recognised for her health and safety expertise, Kirsty has considerable experience of regulatory investigations (including corporate manslaughter), the applicability of RIDDOR and advising on all compliance matters.

In addition to having higher rights of audience in all courts, she is an assistant coroner in the West Yorkshire (West) area. She regularly provides training to clients and to professional bodies such as ICE, CECA and IOSH.

Kirsty said: "I am excited to be joining such a talented and respected team of people. I was attracted by DAC Beachcroft's outstanding reputation and the SHE team's track record of providing a top quality, commercial service to its clients. I am very much looking forward to helping the firm build on its already exceptional credentials."

DAC Beachcroft Partner and Head of SHE, Sally Roff, added: "I am delighted to welcome Kirsty to the team and look forward to working with her. With her broad experience of both health and safety and environmental work, she brings a unique insight to the interaction between the two regimes and will be a great asset to our team."

Issue: 7738 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll