header-logo header-logo

17 July 2024
Issue: 8080 / Categories: Legal News , Planning , Employment , Equality , Pensions , Arbitration , Criminal , Public
printer mail-detail

King’s Speech: Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s long list of priorities

Planning and employment law reform took top billing in the King’s Speech, among an ambitious agenda of more than 35 bills

The Planning and Infrastructure Bill will reform compulsory purchase compensation, modernise planning committees and speed up decision-making.

The Employment Rights Bill ‘will deliver a genuine living wage that accounts for the cost of living’, ban exploitative zero-hours contracts and ‘fire-and-rehire’ practices, and make parental leave, sick pay and protection from unfair dismissal available from day one. However, probationary periods for new hires will stay. Statutory sick pay will be available to ‘all workers’. Flexible working will ‘be the default from day one for all workers, with employers required to accommodate this as far as is reasonable’.

Law Society president Nick Emmerson welcomed the bill’s ‘focus on improving dispute resolution and enforcement’.

Workers’ rights will be further strengthened by the draft Equality (Race and Disability) Bill to enshrine the right to equal pay in law.

Pensions are due a shake-up, with the Pension Schemes Bill increasing duties on private pension providers and reaffirming the Pensions Ombudsman as a competent court.

The government will bring forward the Law Commission’s recommendations for an Arbitration Bill, strengthening arbitrator immunity and empowering arbitrators to summarily dismiss unrealistic cases.

Other bills will allow associate prosecutors to work on appropriate cases and create specialist courts at every Crown Court to fast-track rape cases.

The government will also continue some unfinished business of the previous incumbents, notably the Renters’ Rights Bill, the draft Leasehold and Commonhold Reform Bill, and the Tobacco and Vapes Bill.

Emmerson called for increased access to housing legal aid and resources for the courts, to ‘ensure an appropriate balance between tenants’ rights and landlords’ routes’.

The Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill (Martyn’s law) will help keep public venues safe from terrorism. Paul Tarne, partner, Weightmans, said: ‘The law will need its own regulatory scheme and a body to manage it. Striking the right balance will be key.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll