header-logo header-logo

07 July 2011 / Jennifer James
Issue: 7473 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

Kick the (Hyacinth) Bucket

Jennifer James grapples with the thorny issue of the mother-in-law

The Insider has had more than a fair helping of in-law troubles over the years, from the time I braved an IRA bomb scare in Manchester to purchase Brussels sprouts to please my ex-husband’s mother (who then refused to serve “those ‘orrible yellow things”) to the family trip to Venice with the Italian, the date of which was changed after I had purchased non-refundable airline tickets. I’m not saying I spent the week wishing they would all fall in the Grand Canal, but due to matters beyond my control, I would not have been there to fish them out if they had.

So I can feel the pain of Heidi Withers, whose stepmother-in-law-to-be Carolyn Bourne sent a withering e-mail regarding Heidi’s “poor manners”. Heidi forwarded the e-mail to her friends, who then forwarded it to their friends, and so on, until the e-mail “went viral” becoming a news (or at least a filler) item around the globe. Bourne and her husband have refused to comment,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll