header-logo header-logo

Keep courts infection-free

10 March 2021
Issue: 7924 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Health & safety , Profession
printer mail-detail
Concerns around COVID-19 safety measures as Isleworth falls short

Lawyers have expressed fears about safety in court after Isleworth Crown Court failed a Health and Safety Executive (HSE) COVID-19 inspection on cleaning and social distancing measures.

The inspector visited the court on 29 January and identified contraventions relating to ‘cleaning regimes, social distancing and the monitoring of occupancy levels within the building’, an HSE spokesperson said. HM Courts and Tribunals (HMCTS) have been issued with a notification of contravention and asked to respond to the inspector by 12 April.

Solicitors have raised concerns with the Law Society about potential risks at courts throughout the pandemic. These have included concerns about the enforcement of face masks in public and communal areas, the frequency of cleaning, and having to take instructions in confined and unventilated rooms where social distancing is impossible to maintain. Solicitors have complained of being required to attend court in-person for matters they believed could reasonably be dealt with via remote means.

Law Society president David Greene said: ‘Even though we may be seeing a planned exit from the pandemic it remains absolutely essential that all court users can be assured of the safety of the court environment.

‘If that cannot be assured, as appears to be the case at Isleworth, HMCTS must take immediate action―including possibly closing a court―until it can be.’ 

Safety measures such as plexiglass screens, social distancing marks and frequent cleaning have been implemented to keep court users safe.

However, fears about unsafe courts emerged in January, when the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) revealed figures showing 434 court staff, 69 judges and magistrates, 23 jurors and 73 other court users tested positive for COVID-19 between 24 November 2020 and 11 January 2021. Cases were confirmed at 196 courts within the same period.

The MoJ pointed out that this rate tracked the national average and it should not be assumed that infection took place at court.

Issue: 7924 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Health & safety , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll