header-logo header-logo

Justice without limits

07 March 2025 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 8107 / Categories: Opinion , Child law , Abuse , Limitation
printer mail-detail
210373
Righting wrongs: Richard Scorer welcomes the removal of time limits on civil claims for child sexual abuse

The government’s announcement that it will implement the recommendation by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) to remove the three-year primary limitation period for claims arising from child sexual abuse has been welcomed by abuse survivors. Once legislation is passed, there will be no time limit for civil claims. A defendant will still be able to secure a stay of proceedings if it can satisfy the court that a fair trial is impossible—but the burden of persuading the court will rest on the defendant.

This is a long overdue change. As claimant lawyers argued in evidence to IICSA, limitation has been a significant obstacle to civil justice for those who suffered non-recent child abuse. The gap in time between the abuse of a child, and the child’s disclosure of that abuse—which frequently occurs when the child is well into adulthood—can often be several decades. Claims are often brought many years after the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll