header-logo header-logo

04 July 2019 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7847 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Justice in a time of austerity (Pt 5)

Advice droughts are as damaging & deserve as much attention as advice deserts, says Jon Robins

As NLJ readers know all too well, vast swathes of England and Wales have been reduced to legal advice deserts. Earlier this year Chancery Lane warned that over half of all local authority areas had either one or no housing legal aid provider.

How helpful is it to talk of ‘advice deserts’? The phrase is misleading. It suggests that people lucky enough to live outside of advice deserts can find advice or representation. Obviously, that’s not true. Even if someone manages to find a living, breathing legal aid lawyer they have to be eligible and their legal problem has to fall within what remains of the post-LASPO legal aid scheme.

But that’s not the end of the story. Last month Dr Jo Wilding, a barrister based at Garden Court Chambers, published her research into the dysfunctional and failing ‘market’ of publicly-funded legal advice in immigration and asylum advice (‘Droughts and Deserts:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll