header-logo header-logo

Justice calls for clarity

15 March 2012
Issue: 7505 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Senior judge calls for “quick win” for family justice reform

Simplified, “plain language” steps for the appointment of expert witnesses in family cases should be introduced, the senior judge in charge of reviewing family justice has said.

Mr Justice Ryder identified this as a “quick win”—one of “those changes which we all agree should be made without delay and where changes in legislation may not be necessary”.

“I am working closely with government lawyers and the Family Procedure Rule Committee to identify rules and/or practice direction changes to give more clarity about when it is appropriate to appoint an expert and to ensure that the work commissioned from experts is necessary and relevant to the issues to be decided by the court,” he says, in his third update on his Family Justice Modernisation Programme.

Ryder J says there will be greater continuity of case management by judges and case managers under new docketing guidance agreed with the Judicial Executive Board. There is already an expectation that judges and legal advisers should not be away from their court for more than a month at a time, he says.

The judge reports that the National Family Justice Board is due to launch next month, and discussion is ongoing over the contributions required of judges to local boards.

A national pilot on data reporting for judges will also begin next month. Leadership judges will be given “reliable data from court hearings and about the volume and type of work that takes place in the family courts”, allowing them “to improve performance and to contribute to effective business plans for the best use of our resources”. 

Ryder J says he expects the government to create a statutory family court within the next year, and agreement has been reached over the division of work between the High Court and the family court.

He is due to announce his recommendations for reform by 31 July 2012, having first agreed them with the Family Procedure Rule Committee, the Family Justice Council, leadership judges, the Judicial Executive Board and the HMCTS board.

Issue: 7505 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll