header-logo header-logo

Justice— not a lottery?

31 July 2008 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7332 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

The decision in Hoare represents a common sense approach to achieving justice, says Seamus Burns

Fears of the floodgates being opened following the High Court decision in A v Hoare [2008] EWHC 1573 (QB) (08 July 2008), [2008] All ER (D) 95 (Jul) are greatly exaggerated and misconceived.

However, Mr Justice Coulson's decision to exercise his discretion under s 33 of the Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980) and to disapply the relevant three-year limitation period, so that the claimant, Mrs A, was entitled to pursue her claim for damages, represents a welcome sign that the courts are prepared to fashion the law in a manner conducive to achieving justice.

Mrs A commenced her proceedings on 22 December 2004, more than 16 years after the defendant, Iorworth Hoare, had been convicted of attempted rape of her and sentenced to life imprisonment (and who had subsequently been released from prison on licence on 10 May 2004, and had fortuitously won £7m on the National Lottery, whilst still on day release).

The High Court decision follows hard

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll