header-logo header-logo

Juggling competing priorities at the MoJ

01 June 2017 / Steve Hynes
Issue: 7748 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services
printer mail-detail
nlj_7748_hynes

Whoever is appointed (or reappointed) as the next Lord Chancellor will have a groaning in-tray, says Steve Hynes

Call this reckless speculation if you like, but the opinion polls are not likely to be so out of kilter with the electorate that we cannot expect a majority conservative government to be returned at the general election. Much less predictable is who will be put in charge at the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) on 9 June. Elizabeth Truss, the current Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary, seems likely to be re-shuffled due to her poor relationship with the senior judiciary. Whoever is appointed (or maybe re-appointed) by the Prime Minister there is a groaning in-tray waiting for them.

Two years ago, Michael Gove, Truss’s predecessor, succeeded in securing £700m in investment to modernise the Civil Courts and Tribunals system. He got a further £270m set aside for the digitisation of the criminal courts. Under Truss the MoJ has commenced the work on transforming the courts system. This includes the establishment of a new online

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll