header-logo header-logo

Judicial costs control

19 October 2012 / Charlie Clarke-Jervoise
Issue: 7534 / Categories: Features , Costs
printer mail-detail

Charlie Clarke-Jervoise explores the brave new world of costs management

The recent decision by the senior costs judge, Master Hurst in Henry v News Group Newspapers [2012] EWHC 90218 (Costs), is a useful indicator of how seriously judges are likely to take their duty to manage costs.

Costs budgeting, also known as costs estimating and costs management, was first mooted by Lord Justice Jackson in his preliminary report in May 2009. He identified a peculiarity of litigation, namely that, at the time when costs were being run up, no-one knew who would be paying the bill or how much that bill would be. In his view it was no longer acceptable for questions of costs to be left to the end of litigation—some judicial control on the expenditure of costs during the life of the case had to be introduced as a necessary part of case management. After all, he noted, litigation was often a “project”, which both parties were pursuing for commercial ends. Any

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll