header-logo header-logo

05 March 2025
Issue: 8107 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Judges given more sitting days

The Lord Chancellor has announced an increase in judicial sitting days and a £28.5m budget boost for repairs to the court buildings.

There will be 110,000 Crown Court sitting days in the next financial year, 4,000 more than was initially allocated in the previous year.

Bar Council chair Barbara Mills KC said: ‘We welcome the record increase in Crown Court sitting days to the highest it has been in a decade.

‘This positive step is the first in a long list of measures needed to restore our criminal justice system. Rather than introducing new courts, by investing in more sitting days we can begin to grapple with the backlog and restore public trust and confidence.

‘Ultimately, if we are to reduce the delays and impact on victims, witnesses, and defendants, there should be no limit on the number of days courts can sit.’

Law Society president Richard Atkinson highlighted: ‘Sitting days are still not at the maximum the Lady Chief Justice has said is possible to achieve.

‘The funding increase for court maintenance is only a small fraction of the £1.3bn repairs backlog for courts and tribunals reported by the National Audit Office.’

The announcement coincides with the publication of a harrowing report by the Victims’ Commissioner, Baroness Newlove, ‘Justice delayed—the impact of the Crown Court backlog on victims, victim services and the criminal justice system’.

The report details the ‘gruelling impact’ of delays on victims, 48% of whom have had their Crown Court trial date rescheduled. It found victims struggling to cope with the lengthy delays, with some unable to work, suffering health problems and even turning to self-harm or alcohol abuse to cope with the uncertainty.

The Public Accounts Committee also published a report this week criticising the government’s response to the backlog at the Crown Court, now at record levels.
Issue: 8107 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll