header-logo header-logo

Judges behaving badly

10 October 2013
Issue: 7579 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Speedier system for complaints against judiciary

The time period for making a complaint against a judge or magistrate has been cut from one year to three months under a new, speedier system.

The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office—which took over from the Office for Judicial Complaints—launched its new complaints handling service last week.

There will now be one over-arching set of regulations, with different sets of rules for courts, tribunals and magistrates.

Complaints that fall short of misconduct may be dealt with pastorally, while certain categories of cases such as criminal convictions will be dealt with under a faster, summary process. Serious complaints will be handled through a new two-tier system. If the judicial office holder faces potential removal or suspension from office, they will have a right to have the matter referred to a disciplinary hearing panel. Otherwise, there is no automatic right to a hearing but the judge or magistrate may request that the Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice make a further investigation before a decision is made.

Last year, three tribunal members, 17 magistrates and one judge were removed from office, a further 19 judicial office holders were reprimanded, and 16 resigned. More than 1,000 eligible complaints were received.

Issue: 7579 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll