header-logo header-logo

27 January 2017 / David Hewitt
Issue: 7731 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Joseph: a lesson for us all (Pt 2)

nlj_7731_davies_backpage_0

David Hewitt shares his reflections on a local strike with lasting impact

 

I have already written about “Joseph”—the man from Thornton, near Blackpool, who was sent to fight in the Great War by the Central Tribunal (NLJ, 20 January 2017, p 22).

That tribunal sat in Westminster and was chaired by the fourth Marquess of Salisbury, and he and his colleagues decided that Joseph was simply a hawker of fruit and veg. But their decision was controversial, because Joseph said he was actually a market gardener and a committee of councillors in Thornton had taken him at his word.

The Thornton councillors made up a “local tribunal”, of which there were more than two thousand during the war, and after conscription was introduced, in early 1916, it fell to them to decide whether men might be given an exemption from military service.

It wasn’t that Joseph didn’t want to fight—he had, in fact, already enlisted for military service—he just didn’t want to fight right now. He had

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll