header-logo header-logo

29 July 2010
Issue: 7428 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Jackson-style CFAs plan

Ministry announcement expected in the Autumn

Extensive plans to reform conditional fee agreements (CFAs) will be announced by the Ministry of Justice in the autumn with a view to making “significant cost savings”.

Announcing the consultation in Parliament this week, justice minister Jonathan Djanogly said the consultation would look at implementing Lord Justice Jackson’s review of civil litigation funding, and would focus on CFAs. He said the government was “taking these proposals forward as a matter of priority”.

“CFAs have played a role in giving access to justice to a range of people,” Djanogly said.

“However, high costs under the existing arrangements have now become a serious concern, particularly in clinical negligence cases against the NHS Litigation Authority and in defamation proceedings.”

The Jackson Review recommended introducing contingency fees, also known as damages-based agreements, for litigation. They are often used in employment tribunals but are not permitted in litigation before the courts.
Jackson proposed abolishing the recoverability of success fees and after-the-event insurance premiums for CFAs—a move that would require primary legislation. This would oblige successful claimants to pay their own lawyer’s success fee.

David Greene, partner at Edwin Coe LLP and NLJ consultant editor, says: “The statement from the minister suggests that the aim of the government is primarily to cut the cost of litigation to the NHS and local authorities.”

Greene believes that impact assessment to measure the effect of changes should accompany the consultation and that the “headline grabbing” concept of cutting litigation costs may hold sway with the government.

“Lord Justice Jackson’s report published in January this year was largely aimed at the personal injury market,” he says. “It received mixed reviews; unsurprisingly with APIL [the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers] and claimants lawyers suggesting it will cut access to justice and FOIL [the Forum of Insurance Lawyers] and insurers suggesting it will improve it for defendants and cut their costs.

“At the same time Lord Young’s Claims Standards Council has launched a review of personal injury claims, with public events to be held from October.”
Greene adds that August could offer some respite because, for both sides of the PI market it is likely to be “all hands on deck” for the Autumn. (For more on personal injury litigation & costs see p 1061.)

Issue: 7428 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll