header-logo header-logo

11 November 2016
Issue: 7723 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Jackson to review fixed recoverable costs

Lord Justice Jackson is to lead a review of fixed recoverable costs, due for completion by 31 July 2017.

Jackson LJ has been chosen to head the review because he recommended the application of fixed recoverable costs in his 2010 review of civil litigation procedures and costs. He will formally begin work in January but is inviting written submissions on the topic immediately.

His review will develop proposals for extending the present civil fixed recoverable costs regime in England and Wales, and consider the types and areas of litigation and value of claims to which fixed recoverable costs could apply.

Jackson LJ has previously called for fixed recoverable costs to be introduced for all civil cases valued at up to £250,000. He said the review was “integral to the overall package of reforms which I originally proposed. 

He said: “Chapter 16 of my final report recommended that serious consideration should be given to extending fixed recoverable costs to the lower reaches of the multi-track after the other reforms had bedded in. Although the momentum is heavily for reform, the review will provide ample opportunity for comments and submissions on the form and scope that reform should take.” 

Professor Dominic Regan, NLJ columnist and adviser to Lord Justice Jackson, said the appointment “comes as no surprise. 

“Often overlooked is the fact that Sir Rupert must retire on 7 March 2018, so he will want to crack on. I believe that he will stick to his guns and maintain that fixed costs up to £250,000 is viable.”

The review builds on Ministry of Justice proposals to extend recoverable costs, outlined in the Ministry’s September consultation paper, Transforming our Justice System. In the paper, the Ministry stated: “We will look at options to extend fixed recoverable costs much more widely, so the costs of going to court will be clearer and more appropriate. Our aim is that losing parties should not be hit with disproportionately high legal costs, and people will be able to make more informed decisions on whether to take or defend legal action.”

Written submissions to assist the review should be sent to fixed.costs@judiciary.gsi.gov.uk by 16 January 2016.

Issue: 7723 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll