header-logo header-logo

Jackson to review fixed recoverable costs

11 November 2016
Issue: 7723 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lord Justice Jackson is to lead a review of fixed recoverable costs, due for completion by 31 July 2017.

Jackson LJ has been chosen to head the review because he recommended the application of fixed recoverable costs in his 2010 review of civil litigation procedures and costs. He will formally begin work in January but is inviting written submissions on the topic immediately.

His review will develop proposals for extending the present civil fixed recoverable costs regime in England and Wales, and consider the types and areas of litigation and value of claims to which fixed recoverable costs could apply.

Jackson LJ has previously called for fixed recoverable costs to be introduced for all civil cases valued at up to £250,000. He said the review was “integral to the overall package of reforms which I originally proposed. 

He said: “Chapter 16 of my final report recommended that serious consideration should be given to extending fixed recoverable costs to the lower reaches of the multi-track after the other reforms had bedded in. Although the momentum is heavily for reform, the review will provide ample opportunity for comments and submissions on the form and scope that reform should take.” 

Professor Dominic Regan, NLJ columnist and adviser to Lord Justice Jackson, said the appointment “comes as no surprise. 

“Often overlooked is the fact that Sir Rupert must retire on 7 March 2018, so he will want to crack on. I believe that he will stick to his guns and maintain that fixed costs up to £250,000 is viable.”

The review builds on Ministry of Justice proposals to extend recoverable costs, outlined in the Ministry’s September consultation paper, Transforming our Justice System. In the paper, the Ministry stated: “We will look at options to extend fixed recoverable costs much more widely, so the costs of going to court will be clearer and more appropriate. Our aim is that losing parties should not be hit with disproportionately high legal costs, and people will be able to make more informed decisions on whether to take or defend legal action.”

Written submissions to assist the review should be sent to fixed.costs@judiciary.gsi.gov.uk by 16 January 2016.

Issue: 7723 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll