header-logo header-logo

Jackson report counts the cost

14 May 2009
Issue: 7369 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Costs
printer mail-detail

Access to justice and fairness core to ambitious review of civil litigation costs

Lord Justice Jackson launched his preliminary report into the cost of civil litigation at a press conference last Friday.

The 650-page report is the culmination of four months of research, and covers how civil litigation is—or could be funded—legal aid, before and after-the-event insurance, third party funding, conditional fee agreements, and contingency fees.

The report looks at the present regime of fixed costs, as well as ways to control the costs of litigation, such as case management, cost capping, and recoverability of success fees.

Peter Clough, head of disputes at Osborne Clark, says: “Lord Justice Jackson and his team have taken on a huge task in his root-and-branch review of civil litigation costs. It’s a very ambitious project on a complex set of issues. Although this preliminary report gives little away about his current thinking, it highlights the areas upon which he would like comments during the consultation.

“One area of concern expressed to him relates to the costs of exchanging documents about the disputes. If the final report suggests any radical changes, it will be interesting to see if there is sufficient political will to implement them in the current economic climate.”

Amanda Wadey, a solicitor at LexisPSL, commended the breadth of Jackson LJ’s remit and the amount he has already achieved in four months. “While he accepts that we are confined to some extent by our common law system it is clear that he is starting with a clean sheet,” she says. “His exploration of civil code jurisdictions shows that he does not consider himself confined by the current structure. It is evident that access to justice is at the core of this root and branch review and this has to be applauded.”

Jackson LJ is consulting on his report until the end of July and intends to publish his final report in December. The report is available at http://www.judiciary.gov. uk/about_judiciary/cost-review/ preliminary-report.htm (see this issue pp 683, 685 & 706).

Issue: 7369 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll