header-logo header-logo

Jackson leaves gap

06 March 2013
Issue: 7551 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Law firms may be exposed to professional negligence claims

The Jackson reforms could leave law firms exposed to professional negligence claims, a legal expenses insurer has warned.

The new rules, due to take effect on 1 April, prohibit the recovery of after-the-event (ATE) premiums for policies purchased on or after that date, regardless of when the client entered into a retainer with their solicitor.

This could land clients with huge bills they can’t pay and leave solicitors facing negligence actions if the solicitor fails to secure ATE before the 1 April deadline.

According to Russell Smart, chief operating officer of Elite Insurance, there are thousands of conditional fee agreement (CFA) cases where ATE insurance has not yet been purchased either because the case is not insurable until investigations are complete or enquiries are still ongoing. This means that, where CFAs are entered into before 1 April, the client may neither be able to recover their ATE premium nor benefit from the 10% increase in damages and qualified one-way costs shifting.

Consequently, clients will either have to pursue their cases uninsured or face disproportionately high ATE premiums which will have to be paid back from their damages.

Smart said: “ATE insurers tried to engage with Lord Justice Jackson and the Ministry of Justice over the last three years but without success and therefore it does not come as a surprise that they have not thought through the ramifications.

“The rules should be amended to allow for recoverable ATE premiums based on the date the CFA was entered into.”

Issue: 7551 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll