header-logo header-logo

15 January 2009
Issue: 7352 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

It's a judge's life

Profession

Top lawyers are shunning opportunities to join the Bench, which many view as old fashioned and underpaid.

Six recently appointed High Court judges and 29 highly qualified barristers and solicitors contributed to reserach into "attractiveness" of senior judicial appointments. The results were published last week by the Judicial Executive Board.

The difficulty of persuading top ranking lawyers to graduate to the High Court bench was highlighted by one female interviewee who commented: "I have no interest in fulltime appointment. It is the conditions of service. Fivefold reduction in income. Less control over professional life and I would feel bound to go on circuit.

"The idea of spending the next 15 years of my life being a High Court Judge doing rubbish work is frankly too depressing to contemplate."

The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge, says he is confident that concerns such as "working in an old fashioned, fustian atmosphere" are based on misapprehensions about life as High Court judge. He adds that one of the most striking features of the judiciary is the warm collegiate support that they offer each other. He also defended the circuit system claiming that few of the practitioners interviewed had reliable information regarding what circuit life entailed.

Issue: 7352 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll