header-logo header-logo

Is Rwanda agreement lawful?

02 September 2022
Issue: 7992 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail
The UK–Rwanda partnership is not legally binding, has not been subject to scrutiny by Parliament, and fails to protect asylum-seekers’ rights, the Law Society has warned

Giving evidence to the House of Lords International Agreements Committee last week, the Law Society highlighted that the UK would be unable to protect an asylum seeker’s human rights. It warned people would be given insufficient notice or time to get legal advice about their removal―just 14 days, or seven days if in immigration detention.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said monitoring bodies referred to in the agreement have not been set up and there were few details. Moreover, Boyce said there was a risk individuals removed by the UK might face persecution in Rwanda or be returned to their country of origin, breaking the 1951 UN Convention on Refugees prohibition on ‘refoulement’.

The Committee, chaired by Baroness Hayter, is conducting an inquiry into the memorandum of understanding between the UK and Rwanda for an asylum partnership agreement.

Issue: 7992 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Ceri Morgan analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Johnson v FirstRand Bank
Tech companies will be legally required to prevent material that encourages or assists serious self-harm appearing on their platforms, under Online Safety Act 2023 regulations due to come into force in the autumn
Commercial leasehold, the defence of insanity and ‘consent’ in the criminal law are among the next tranche of projects for the Law Commission
In this month's update, employment guru Ian Smith reveals the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s pivotal role in the ongoing supermarket equal pay litigation, upholding most findings and confirming that detailed training materials are valid evidence of actual work
County court cases are speeding up, with the median time from claim to hearing 62 weeks for fast, intermediate and multi-track claims—5.4 weeks faster than last year
back-to-top-scroll