header-logo header-logo

13 October 2020
Issue: 7906 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Intimidation can be ‘part of everyday life’ at Bar

Bullying, discrimination and harassment at the Bar are widespread, a study commissioned by the Bar Standards Board (BSB) has found

Experiences varied between sexual harassment, unfair treatment on the basis of protected characteristics, long-term bullying, unreasonable work demands, belittling comments and unfair work allocation. Low to medium-level incidents were the most common, particularly for people from underrepresented groups. The study uncovered a ‘shared sense’ that a barrister who wasn’t white, male and from a ‘high social grade’ was less likely to be recommended by clerks, given work by senior barristers or employed by solicitors.

In the report, 'Bullying, Discrimination and Harassment at the Bar', published this week barristers pointed out that the Bar is ‘an environment in which power is key, and the ability to dominate over other people in order to win an argument is crucial.

‘In this environment, bullying and intimidation are rife, and often seem like part of everyday life at the Bar.’ Participants said ‘this culture of bullying and aggression is often a learned behaviour pattern―many were bullied or victimised themselves as young barristers, and therefore can feel it is the norm to act this way’.

Such behaviour can have long-term consequences, such as diminished self-esteem, anxiety, health complications, lowered earning capacity and disruption of professional relationships.

Pupil barristers were the most vulnerable, participants said. Even the architecture of the Bar, with ‘warrens of small rooms and poorly lit courtyards’ producing a ‘conspiratorial’ atmosphere made it easier for bullying to happen.

The study, by YouGov, involved telephone interviews with 30 barristers and five non-barristers who had directly experienced or observed bullying, discrimination and harassment at the Bar.

However, most barristers interviewed had not formally reported their experiences, mainly due to fears for their reputation at work and future career.

The study called for a shift in culture at the Bar to encourage openness and discourage inappropriate behaviour, with a role for the BSB, Bar Council and professional networks in driving change.

BSB head of equality and access to justice, Amit Popat, said: ‘It is plain from the study that there are significant cultural factors, including power imbalances, which inhibit the reporting of bullying and harassment.’

 

 

Issue: 7906 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Megan Bradbury

Clarke Willmott—Megan Bradbury

Corporate team welcomes paralegal inSouthampton

Howard Kennedy—Paul Moran

Howard Kennedy—Paul Moran

London firm strengthens real estate team with partner appointment

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll