header-logo header-logo

25 February 2022 / Masood Ahmed , Syed Naman Ali
Issue: 7968 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , ADR , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

International arbitration: clause & effect

73197
Admissibility & jurisdiction: Masood Ahmed & Syed Ali report on dispute resolution clauses in international commercial arbitration
  • Two recent High Court decisions have confirmed that pre-arbitral dispute resolution obligations are not matters of jurisdiction; rather they are matters of admissibility, which are for arbitral tribunals to determine and not the national courts.

Dispute resolution clauses (sometimes referred to as ADR clauses or tiered clauses) are becoming an increasingly common feature of international commercial contracts. In essence, a dispute resolution clause (DR clause) requires parties to exhaust a number of alternative dispute resolution procedures (eg negotiation, mediation etc) before the matter can be referred to arbitration or litigation. Therefore, DR clauses provide the parties with opportunities to explore whether their dispute can be settled before launching expensive and time-consuming court or arbitration proceedings.

An issue that may arise in arbitration is whether a party’s failure to comply with a DR clause may give rise to an issue of admissibility for the arbitral tribunal, or whether it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll