header-logo header-logo

Insurance surgery: liability & multi-party accidents abroad

16 February 2017 / Kelvin Farmaner
Issue: 7735 / Categories: Features , Insurance surgery , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail
nlj_7735_farmaner

The Court of Appeal has provided welcome clarity on determining which laws should apply in cross-border cases, says Kelvin Farmaner

  • Art 4(3) of Rome II in multi-tort cases.
  • When determining the applicable law, it is relevant to look at all of the claims against the other parties not just the specific claim advanced against the defendant in question.

The growth of international travel for both work and pleasure has meant the number of injury claims relating to accidents abroad has increased. However, the fact that an accident occurred abroad may create a number of difficulties. One such difficulty is the question of which law will apply to the resulting claims. For all accidents occurring after 11 January 2009, this is governed by Regulation (EC) 864/2007 (known as Rome II); Art 4 of which deals with choice of law and sets out a general principle, an exception and an escape clause.

The general principle: Art 4(1)

The general principle is that the applicable law will be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll