header-logo header-logo

Insolvency—Jurisdiction—Agreement of parties

17 May 2013
Issue: 7560 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

HSBC Bank v Tambrook Jersey Ltd [2013] EWHC 866 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 116 (Apr)
 

Chancery Division, Mann J, 12 Apr 2013

In order for an English court to provide “assistance” to a foreign court under s 426(4) of the Insolvency Act 1986, there have to be existing or future intended insolvency proceedings in that other court.

Stephen Robins (instructed by CMS Cameron McKenna) for the bank.

The claimant company was registered in Jersey. Its centre of main interests was in Jersey, but its main business activity was in England. It borrowed more than £6m for the defendant bank in order to purchase and develop property in England. That venture was a major failure, and the bank became the defendant’s main creditor.

The director of the claimant and the bank arranged for sale of the property to occur, but considered it appropriate that a form of insolvency procedure occur before sale. It was not considered that Jersey insolvency proceedings would be appropriate, as the only available Jersey procedure, known as “Desastre”,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll