header-logo header-logo

Insolvency

11 July 2013
Issue: 7568 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Wood and another v Gorbunova and others [2013] EWHC 1935 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 83 (Jul)

Following the death of Boris Berezovsky, court-appointed receivers applied to the court for an order directing that the sums which they would have to pay to the respondent third parties and their own costs and expenses in connection with the application should be paid out of the assets of B’s estate. The Chancery Division held that it should treat a receiver appointed by the court in relation to an application made by such a receiver against a third party in the same way as with litigants in other capacities such as a liquidator, a trustee or a personal representative who initiated proceedings against a third party. It was a basic principle of receivership that the receiver was entitled to be indemnified in respect of his costs and expenses. The receivers were entitled to indemnify themselves out of the assets of the estate to the extent of two thirds of the costs they had to pay one respondent. In respect of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll