header-logo header-logo

Inside out

02 September 2010 / Oliver Assersohn
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Features , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Oliver Assersohn analyses the first FSA initiated prosecution for insider trading to end in acquittal

Rv (1) McFall (2) Rimmington (3) King [2010] Southwark Crown Court is the first Financial Services Authority (FSA) initiated criminal prosecution for insider trading to end in acquittals for the defendants. The case is of interest to practitioners and traders not only because of the facts but also because some of the arguments raised may be of relevance to other cases both in a criminal and regulatory context.

The allegations

Mr King, who was finance director of Neutec Pharma Plc (a biotechnology company), was accused of disclosing insider information relating to the takeover of Neutec by Novartis to his friend, Mr McFall, who was in turn alleged to have passed that inside information to his friend, Mr Rimmington. The FSA’s case was that Mr Rimmington then traded on the basis of that inside information. Both Mr McFall and Mr Rimmington were leading City lawyers in separate firms. All three defendants consistently denied any wrongdoing.

The trial

The trial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll