header-logo header-logo

02 September 2010 / Oliver Assersohn
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Features , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Inside out

Oliver Assersohn analyses the first FSA initiated prosecution for insider trading to end in acquittal

Rv (1) McFall (2) Rimmington (3) King [2010] Southwark Crown Court is the first Financial Services Authority (FSA) initiated criminal prosecution for insider trading to end in acquittals for the defendants. The case is of interest to practitioners and traders not only because of the facts but also because some of the arguments raised may be of relevance to other cases both in a criminal and regulatory context.

The allegations

Mr King, who was finance director of Neutec Pharma Plc (a biotechnology company), was accused of disclosing insider information relating to the takeover of Neutec by Novartis to his friend, Mr McFall, who was in turn alleged to have passed that inside information to his friend, Mr Rimmington. The FSA’s case was that Mr Rimmington then traded on the basis of that inside information. Both Mr McFall and Mr Rimmington were leading City lawyers in separate firms. All three defendants consistently denied any wrongdoing.

The trial

The trial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll