header-logo header-logo

18 February 2021 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7921 / Categories: Features , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Injustice clustered: a stacked system

39817
The ‘single-issue’ approach of the legal system ensures it is stacked against the disadvantaged, says Jon Robins

Social welfare lawyers will recognise the scenario. The flustered client who arrives with their shopping bag stuffed full of unopened correspondence. Each bill reveals one more unresolved issue. Problems rarely arise singularly but, like buses, they tend to come all at once and when they do, they are overwhelming.

Legal policy wonks have a name for the phenomenon: ‘problem clusters’. Someone loses their job, they can’t afford to pay their rent or mortgage, they have problems claiming welfare benefits, etc. It has been the subject of debate in the legal aid world, and some controversial policy initiatives, since the influential 2004 study Causes of Action: Civil Law and Social Justice.

Yet lawyers, the courts and much of the administrative bureaucracy surrounding public bodies, operate on a ‘single-issue’ basis. It is that complexity, and the indifference of our legal system to it, that is the subject of a fascinating and thoughtful book

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll